Kiro vs Void | agentconfig.ing

Kiro vs VoidComparisonUpdated 2026-03-16

SUMMARY

Kiro (IDE) uses markdown configuration while Void (IDE) uses markdown. They differ on 2 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

Feature	Kiro	Void	Notes
Config format	markdown	markdown
Hierarchy support	✓	✗	Whether config files can be placed at multiple directory levels
Global config	✓	✗	User-wide configuration outside any project
Project config	✓	✓
Subdirectory scoping	✗	✗	Config files in subdirectories that apply only to that subtree
File inclusion / imports	✗	✗	Ability to include or reference other files from config
Ignore file	✗	✗
IDE integration	✓	✓
Schema / structure	Free-form (Markdown)	Free-form (Markdown)	Whether config uses structured schema or free-form content
Git committed	✓	✓	Whether primary config files are intended to be version-controlled
Encoding	UTF-8	UTF-8

SIDE-BY-SIDE CODE SAMPLES

Kiro

.kiro/steering/*.md

markdown

---
inclusion: always
---

# Project Standards

## Stack
- TypeScript 5.x with Node.js 22
- AWS CDK v2 for infrastructure
- DynamoDB for data, S3 for assets

## Conventions
- Use ESM imports, not CommonJS
- Lambda handlers export a named `handler` function
- Use middy middleware for cross-cutting concerns
- All API responses follow JSON:API format

## Testing
- Unit tests with vitest
- Integration tests with aws-testing-library
- E2E tests use deployed staging environment

Void

.void/rules/*.md

markdown

---
description: Python backend conventions
globs: "app/**/*.py"
auto_apply: true
---

# Backend Rules

## Stack
- Python 3.12 with FastAPI
- SQLAlchemy 2.0 with async sessions
- Alembic for migrations
- pytest for testing

## Conventions
- Use type hints on all function signatures
- Async endpoints by default
- Pydantic v2 models for request/response schemas
- Repository pattern for database access

## File Structure
- app/api/routes/ — API endpoints
- app/models/ — SQLAlchemy models
- app/schemas/ — Pydantic schemas
- app/services/ — Business logic

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Hierarchy support

Kiro: Supported. Void: Not supported.

2. Global config

Kiro: Supported. Void: Not supported.

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use Kiro, configure .kiro/steering/*.md. If you use Void, configure .void/rules/*.md. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh

bash

# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md