OpenCode vs QodoUpdated 2026-03-16

SUMMARY

OpenCode (CLI) uses markdown configuration while Qodo (IDE) uses toml. They differ on 6 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

FeatureOpenCodeQodo
Config formatmarkdowntoml
Hierarchy support
Global config
Project config
Subdirectory scoping
File inclusion / imports
Ignore file
IDE integrationCLI
Schema / structureFree-form (Markdown)unknown
Git committed
EncodingUTF-8UTF-8

FILE MAPPING

PurposeOpenCodeQodo
Settings / configurationopencode.json.pr_agent.toml

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Config format

OpenCode: markdown. Qodo: toml.

2. Hierarchy support

OpenCode: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

3. Global config

OpenCode: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

4. Subdirectory scoping

OpenCode: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

5. IDE integration

OpenCode: CLI. Qodo: Supported.

6. Schema / structure

OpenCode: Free-form (Markdown). Qodo: unknown.

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use OpenCode, configure AGENTS.md. If you use Qodo, configure .pr_agent.toml. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh
bash
# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md

SEE ALSO

agentconfig.ing2026-03-16COMPARE(1)