Cursor vs QodoUpdated 2026-03-16

SUMMARY

Cursor (IDE) uses mdc configuration while Qodo (IDE) uses toml. They differ on 6 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

FeatureCursorQodo
Config formatmdctoml
Hierarchy support
Global config
Project config
Subdirectory scoping
File inclusion / imports
Ignore file.cursorignore
IDE integration
Schema / structureHybrid (MDC frontmatter + Markdown)unknown
Git committed
EncodingUTF-8UTF-8

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Config format

Cursor: mdc. Qodo: toml.

2. Hierarchy support

Cursor: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

3. Global config

Cursor: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

4. Subdirectory scoping

Cursor: Supported. Qodo: Not supported.

5. Ignore file

Cursor: .cursorignore. Qodo: Not supported.

6. Schema / structure

Cursor: Hybrid (MDC frontmatter + Markdown). Qodo: unknown.

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use Cursor, configure .cursorrules. If you use Qodo, configure .pr_agent.toml. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh
bash
# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md

SEE ALSO

agentconfig.ing2026-03-16COMPARE(1)