Cursor vs JinnUpdated 2026-03-17

SUMMARY

Cursor (IDE) uses mdc configuration while Jinn (CLI) uses yaml. They differ on 7 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

FeatureCursorJinn
Config formatmdcyaml
Hierarchy support
Global config
Project config
Subdirectory scoping
File inclusion / imports
Ignore file.cursorignore
IDE integrationCLI
Schema / structureHybrid (MDC frontmatter + Markdown)unknown
Git committed
EncodingUTF-8UTF-8

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Config format

Cursor: mdc. Jinn: yaml.

2. Hierarchy support

Cursor: Supported. Jinn: Not supported.

3. Project config

Cursor: Supported. Jinn: Not supported.

4. Subdirectory scoping

Cursor: Supported. Jinn: Not supported.

5. Ignore file

Cursor: .cursorignore. Jinn: Not supported.

6. IDE integration

Cursor: Supported. Jinn: CLI.

7. Schema / structure

Cursor: Hybrid (MDC frontmatter + Markdown). Jinn: unknown.

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use Cursor, configure .cursorrules. If you use Jinn, configure config.yaml. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh
bash
# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md

SEE ALSO

agentconfig.ing2026-03-17COMPARE(1)