Axe vs Gemini Code Assist | agentconfig.ing

Axe vs Gemini Code AssistComparisonUpdated 2026-03-18

SUMMARY

Axe (CLI) uses toml configuration while Gemini Code Assist (IDE) uses markdown. They differ on 6 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

Feature	Axe	Gemini Code Assist	Notes
Config format	toml	markdown
Hierarchy support	✗	✓	Whether config files can be placed at multiple directory levels
Global config	✓	✗	User-wide configuration outside any project
Project config	✓	✓
Subdirectory scoping	✗	✓	Config files in subdirectories that apply only to that subtree
File inclusion / imports	✗	✗	Ability to include or reference other files from config
Ignore file	✗	✗
IDE integration	CLI	✓
Schema / structure	unknown	Free-form (Markdown)	Whether config uses structured schema or free-form content
Git committed	✓	✓	Whether primary config files are intended to be version-controlled
Encoding	UTF-8	UTF-8

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Config format

Axe: toml. Gemini Code Assist: markdown.

2. Hierarchy support

Axe: Not supported. Gemini Code Assist: Supported.

3. Global config

Axe: Supported. Gemini Code Assist: Not supported.

4. Subdirectory scoping

Axe: Not supported. Gemini Code Assist: Supported.

5. IDE integration

Axe: CLI. Gemini Code Assist: Supported.

6. Schema / structure

Axe: unknown. Gemini Code Assist: Free-form (Markdown).

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use Axe, configure config.toml. If you use Gemini Code Assist, configure GEMINI.md. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh

bash

# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md

SUMMARY

FEATURE COMPARISON

KEY DIFFERENCES

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

PORTABILITY TIP

SEE ALSO