Google Antigravity vs Zed | agentconfig.ing

Google Antigravity vs ZedComparisonUpdated 2026-03-18

SUMMARY

Google Antigravity (IDE) uses markdown configuration while Zed (Editor) uses markdown. They differ on 3 of 11 compared features. Both tools provide AI-assisted development but take different approaches to project configuration.

FEATURE COMPARISON

Feature	Google Antigravity	Zed	Notes
Config format	markdown	markdown
Hierarchy support	✓	✓	Whether config files can be placed at multiple directory levels
Global config	✗	✓	User-wide configuration outside any project
Project config	✓	✓
Subdirectory scoping	✓	✗	Config files in subdirectories that apply only to that subtree
File inclusion / imports	✗	✗	Ability to include or reference other files from config
Ignore file	✗	✗
IDE integration	✓	Editor
Schema / structure	Free-form (Markdown)	Free-form (Markdown)	Whether config uses structured schema or free-form content
Git committed	✓	✓	Whether primary config files are intended to be version-controlled
Encoding	UTF-8	UTF-8

FILE MAPPING

Purpose	Google Antigravity	Zed
Project instructions	AGENTS.md	Rules Library

SIDE-BY-SIDE CODE SAMPLES

Google Antigravity

AGENTS.md

markdown

# Project Instructions

## Architecture
- Monorepo with apps/ and packages/ directories
- Each app is a standalone Next.js deployment
- Shared packages use TypeScript project references

## Code Standards
- TypeScript strict mode everywhere
- Use Zod for runtime validation at API boundaries
- Prefer server components; use "use client" only when needed
- All database queries go through the data-access layer

## Testing
- Unit tests with Vitest for business logic
- Integration tests for API routes
- E2E tests with Playwright for critical user flows

## Deployment
- Preview deployments on every PR
- Production deploys from main branch only
- Environment variables managed via .env.local (never committed)

Zed

.rules

markdown

# Project Rules

## Stack
- TypeScript 5.x with strict mode
- React 19 with Server Components
- Tailwind CSS v4
- Drizzle ORM with PostgreSQL

## Code Style
- Prefer named exports over default exports
- Use "use client" directive only when interactivity is required
- Colocate tests in __tests__ directories next to source files
- Use Zod for all runtime validation

## Architecture
- App Router with nested layouts in app/
- Server actions in app/actions/
- Database schema in db/schema.ts
- Shared utilities in lib/

## Commands
- Dev server: pnpm dev
- Type check: pnpm typecheck
- Test: pnpm test
- Lint: pnpm lint

KEY DIFFERENCES

1. Global config

Google Antigravity: Not supported. Zed: Supported.

2. Subdirectory scoping

Google Antigravity: Supported. Zed: Not supported.

3. IDE integration

Google Antigravity: Supported. Zed: Editor.

WHICH SHOULD I USE?

Recommendation

Choose based on your IDE/CLI preference. If you use Google Antigravity, configure AGENTS.md. If you use Zed, configure .rules. Many projects include config files for multiple tools so each team member can use their preferred editor.

PORTABILITY TIP

sync-instructions.sh

bash

# Maintain a single source of truth:
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md CLAUDE.md
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md .cursorrules
cp AI-INSTRUCTIONS.md AGENTS.md